Guide

How to solve linear inequalities

By Viktor Lassen4 min readUpdated 3 September 2026

We solve an inequality the same way we solve an equation: do the opposite on both sides until x stands alone. 5x + 6 > 2x + 7 becomes x > 1/3. The only new rule is that the sign flips when we multiply or divide by a negative number.

When we solve inequalities we do it, as said, just like when we solve equations, but we have to watch out for one small difference. When we multiply or divide by a negative number on both sides, the sign turns round. If it was a greater-than, it becomes a less-than, and the other way round. That's the whole hurdle. Everything else you already know.

When do I use this?

Whenever you have an inequality with an x in it and you want to know which values of x make it true. The answer won't be a single number, like it is for an equation, but a range of numbers. Apart from that, the moves are the ones from how to solve linear equations: do the opposite on both sides until x stands alone.

The procedure

Let's look at this inequality:

5x+6>2x+75x + 6 > 2x + 7

The inequality 5x + 6 > 2x + 7, solved like an equation

1. Get the x's on one side. We start by subtracting 2x2x on both sides.

3x+6>73x + 6 > 7

2. Get the numbers on the other side. Now we subtract 6 on both sides,

3x>13x > 1

3. Get x on its own. And finally we divide by 3 on both sides:

x>13x > \frac{1}{3}

and we end up with x having to be greater than 13\tfrac{1}{3}.

4. Read the answer. That x has to be greater than 13\tfrac{1}{3} just means that every value from 13\tfrac{1}{3}, where 13\tfrac{1}{3} itself isn't included, up to an infinitely large number is a solution to this inequality. Notice that 13\tfrac{1}{3} is not included, because x has to be greater than 13\tfrac{1}{3}. If 13\tfrac{1}{3} was allowed to be a solution too, it would have said โ‰ฅ\geq instead of >>.

So, as we see, it's exactly like solving equations. But we just have to remember the rule that if we multiply or divide by a negative number, we have to flip the inequality sign.

The one rule to remember

Nothing happened to the sign in the example above, because we only ever subtracted, and divided by a positive number. The sign flips in one situation only: when we multiply or divide both sides by a negative number.

Here is the rule applied. If we had

โˆ’2x>4-2x > 4

and divided by โˆ’2-2 on both sides, we'd be dividing by a negative number, so the greater-than turns into a less-than:

x<โˆ’2x < -2

Adding and subtracting never flips the sign, and neither does multiplying or dividing by a positive number.

Worked examples

No flip needed. Solve 5x+6>2x+75x + 6 > 2x + 7.

Subtract 2x2x on both sides: 3x+6>73x + 6 > 7. Subtract 6 on both sides: 3x>13x > 1. Divide by 3 on both sides: x>13x > \tfrac{1}{3}.

Every value bigger than 13\tfrac{1}{3} is a solution, and 13\tfrac{1}{3} itself is not.

With the flip. Solve โˆ’2x>4-2x > 4.

Divide by โˆ’2-2 on both sides. We're dividing by a negative number, so the sign turns round: x<โˆ’2x < -2.

We can check this is right, because we know that any number less than โˆ’2-2 should work. Try x=โˆ’3x = -3: โˆ’2ร—(โˆ’3)=6-2 \times (-3) = 6, and 6>46 > 4 holds. Try a number on the wrong side, x=0x = 0: โˆ’2ร—0=0-2 \times 0 = 0, and 0 is not greater than 4, so 0 is not a solution. So the flipped sign was right.

Common mistakes

  • "Forgetting to flip the sign." If you divide both sides by a negative number and leave the sign as it was, the answer points the wrong way. Multiply or divide by a negative, and the sign turns round.
  • "Flipping the sign when you subtract." Subtracting, adding, and dividing by a positive number never touch the sign. Only a negative multiplier or divisor does.
  • "Treating >> as โ‰ฅ\geq." x>13x > \tfrac{1}{3} does not include 13\tfrac{1}{3}. It would take a โ‰ฅ\geq for that.
  • "Expecting one number as the answer." The solution is a whole range: everything from 13\tfrac{1}{3} upwards.

The four signs and the idea behind inequalities are in what is an inequality?. When there are two inequality signs at once, see double inequalities. The solving moves themselves come from how to solve linear equations.

Frequently asked questions

Read next

Want to get good at maths?

Mathara explains every topic step by step with videos, exercises and personal feedback.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Get started for free